Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<div id="mp-itn" class="mp-contains-float" style="padding-left:1em"> | <div id="mp-itn" class="mp-contains-float" style="padding-left:1em"> | ||
'''any time''' — [[:Special:RecentChanges|Latest wiki changes]] | '''any time''' — [[:Special:RecentChanges|Latest wiki changes]] | ||
'''27 May 2025''' — added [[Brieven Ottema|letters Ottema]] to Cornelis and Leendert Over de Linden (1870-1879), transcribed by [[Nico Luitse]]. | |||
'''24 Jan. 2025''' — [[:Category:Ms_pages_with_raw_transcription|Raw transcription]] finished and linked to from translations. | '''24 Jan. 2025''' — [[:Category:Ms_pages_with_raw_transcription|Raw transcription]] finished and linked to from translations. | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 27 May 2025
Codex Oera Linda
- To begin reading the Oera Linda, select a language:
- Old translations
Various Studies
- Fryas based fonts
- Word studies
- Grammar studies
- Studies Nederlandstalig (in Dutch language)
- Geographic locations
Links
News
any time — Latest wiki changes
27 May 2025 — added letters Ottema to Cornelis and Leendert Over de Linden (1870-1879), transcribed by Nico Luitse.
24 Jan. 2025 — Raw transcription finished and linked to from translations.
10 Sept. 2024 — A raw transcription will be provided again (sample). The edited version will be presented as proper chapters in Fryas language and script (sample).
8 Sept. — New improved Standskrift font available on the Fonts page. The old font is available as a separate download.
20 Aug. — The chapter numbering system has been revised. To find the current name/code of a chapter, use the conversion table on the Chapter structure page.
Some theses (draft)
- If it were possible to explain in a scholarly article why Oera Linda cannot be authentic, this would have been done long ago.
- Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic.
- The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions.