Main Page: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m Typo |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
'''[[:Special:RecentChanges|Latest wiki changes]]''' | '''[[:Special:RecentChanges|Latest wiki changes]]''' | ||
'''10 Sept.''' — | '''10 Sept.''' — A raw transcript will be provided again ([[189-190_test2|sample]]). The edited version will be presented as proper chapters in Fryas language and script ([[FS189.01_GLORN%C3%94MAR%C3%81V|sample]]). | ||
'''8 Sept.''' — New improved Standskrift font available on the [[Fonts]] page. The old font is available as a separate download. | '''8 Sept.''' — New improved Standskrift font available on the [[Fonts]] page. The old font is available as a separate download. | ||
Revision as of 18:26, 10 September 2024
Codex Oera Linda
- To begin reading the Oera Linda, select a language:
- Old translations
Various Studies
- Fryas based fonts
- Word studies
- Grammar studies
- Studies Nederlandstalig (in Dutch language)
- Geographic locations
Links
News
10 Sept. — A raw transcript will be provided again (sample). The edited version will be presented as proper chapters in Fryas language and script (sample).
8 Sept. — New improved Standskrift font available on the Fonts page. The old font is available as a separate download.
4 Sept. — Old translations (German, English and Dutch) have been separated from the newer ones.
30 Aug. — Start of Dutch language Oera Linda Course.
20 Aug. — The chapter numbering system has been revised. To find the current name/code of a chapter, use the conversion table on the Chapter structure page.
Some theses (draft)
- Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic.
- The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions.
- If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation.