Jump to content

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Oera Linda Wiki
I would like to discuss the 'did you know' section
add 3 theses (draft)
Line 47: Line 47:
* [https://twitter.com/0eraLinda Twitter page]
* [https://twitter.com/0eraLinda Twitter page]
</div>
</div>
<h2 id="mp-otd-h2" class="mp-h2">(title)</h2>
<h2 id="mp-otd-h2" class="mp-h2">Theses (draft)</h2>
<div id="mp-otd" class="mp-contains-float">
<div id="mp-otd" class="mp-contains-float">
(to be added)
* Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic.
* The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions.
* If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
__NOTOC____NOEDITSECTION__
__NOTOC____NOEDITSECTION__

Revision as of 12:26, 28 February 2024

Welcome to the Oera Linda Wiki

,
the online encyclopaedia about the Oera Linda book.
1,113 articles in English

Codex Oera Linda

Related Sources

Fryas Language

Old/Provisional Pages

News

19 February 2024 — The Oera Linda Foundation is editing the transcription to facilitate the creation of a Fryas grammar and to make it easier to learn the language with consistent spelling. The new revision of Codex Oera Linda, a Dutch translation and a video reading in Fryas are also being worked on.

For further updates related to Oera Linda:

Theses (draft)

  • Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic.
  • The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions.
  • If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation.