Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* [https://twitter.com/0eraLinda Twitter page] | * [https://twitter.com/0eraLinda Twitter page] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<h2 id="mp-otd-h2" class="mp-h2"> | <h2 id="mp-otd-h2" class="mp-h2">Some theses (draft)</h2> | ||
<div id="mp-otd" class="mp-contains-float"> | <div id="mp-otd" class="mp-contains-float"> | ||
* [[Goffe_T._Jensma|Jensma's]] 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic. | * [[Goffe_T._Jensma|Jensma's]] 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic. | ||
Revision as of 13:03, 26 July 2024
Codex Oera Linda
Related Sources
Fryas Language
News
26 July 2024 — The chapter numbering system will be fully revised, but for now, an improvised, modified numbering will be used.
19 February 2024 — The Oera Linda Foundation is editing the transcription to facilitate the creation of a Fryas grammar and to make it easier to learn the language with consistent spelling. The new revision of Codex Oera Linda, a Dutch translation and a video reading in Fryas are also being worked on.
For further updates related to Oera Linda:
Some theses (draft)
- Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic.
- The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions.
- If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation.