Main Page: Difference between revisions
dictionaries link |
link Jensma |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
<h2 id="mp-otd-h2" class="mp-h2">Theses (draft)</h2> | <h2 id="mp-otd-h2" class="mp-h2">Theses (draft)</h2> | ||
<div id="mp-otd" class="mp-contains-float"> | <div id="mp-otd" class="mp-contains-float"> | ||
* Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic. | * [[Goffe_T._Jensma|Jensma's]] 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic. | ||
* The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions. | * The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions. | ||
* If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation. | * If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation. | ||
Revision as of 06:41, 22 May 2024
Codex Oera Linda
Related Sources
Fryas Language
News
19 February 2024 — The Oera Linda Foundation is editing the transcription to facilitate the creation of a Fryas grammar and to make it easier to learn the language with consistent spelling. The new revision of Codex Oera Linda, a Dutch translation and a video reading in Fryas are also being worked on.
For further updates related to Oera Linda:
Theses (draft)
- Jensma's 2004 dissertation on Oera Linda is premised on the assumption that it is a 19th-century creation and thus does not answer the question of why the manuscript or its contents cannot be authentic.
- The alleged evidence against authenticity was given in an 1876 Dutch-language pamphlet and is so lacking in rigor that no one has ever bothered to translate it or confirm its arguments and conclusions.
- If Oera Linda is so obviously fake it should be easy to prove this in an academic publication, but if the falsity is not obvious, it deserves thorough investigation.